lunes, 3 de junio de 2013

Soft, Low and Sweet by Johannes Carl Andersen
















Soft, low and sweet, the blackbird wakes the day,
And clearer pipes, as rosier grows the gray
  Of the wide sky, far, far into whose deep
  The rath lark soars, and scatters down the steep
His runnel song, that skyey roundelay.

Earth with a sigh awakes; and tremors play,
  Coy in her leafy trees, and falt'ring creep
Across the daisy lawn and whisper, "Well-a-day,"
  Soft, low and sweet.

From violet-banks the scent-clouds float away
  And spread around their fragrance, as of sleep:
  From ev'ry mossy nook the blossoms peep;
From ev'ry blossom comes one little ray
That makes the world-wealth one with Spring, alway
  Soft, low and sweet.

Eyri Polanco Gómez

My own dictionary

Acid: the  love   that  your  friends  give  you.

Boy: bad  person how  think  that  is  better  than  others.

Chat: a lightnig place.

Dead: a long race  prediction.

Eyes: Source that comes in a plain.

Furry: To take into the body by the mouth for digestion or absorption.

Glory: Wrong way or not be able to find a path or correct output
Hell:  A good  place  for  make  a party.

Indian: Having a high degree of intelligence; mentally acute.


Jackal: Having an abundant supply

José Luis Lara Lira

Literary Theorists: Renato Prada Oropeza

Renato Prada Oropeza 


He was born in San Luis Potosi (Bolivia), and he has been living in Xalapa, Veracruz (Mexico). Author of novels (The founders of dawn, LongTime, The Vigil, The Last Edge), story books (Nobody expects the man with Orgalia Night, Through hole, The Crib) and books of Analysis and Hermeneutic literary.

In Literature and Society proposed as starting point, a 'socio cultural reality "(Berger and Luckman): reality is not only alien to the human or also as a con-social construction, it is always within a given culture. The man-like King Midas-transforms everything it touches: the effect is the territory of men. Prada Oropeza takes up the Marxist proposal humanization of the world through human praxis to discuss the provision meaningless or semiosis. He states that "the practice human gives meaning to the world, builds the social world"(p. 19). We speak, then, of an interaction between the social and the man-world-culture which corresponds to a constant dialectical: the man is eminently social as their world and at same time, it is in this process.



Everyday language has meaning literal, consists signs whose function is to communicate. Reiterates, in the second chapter, the literature and cannot really understood as hierarchical terms, therefore, the verosimilitude of literary discourse cannot be reduced to a relationship with the actually, in principle, does not represent unified and preexisting human praxis.


Gerardo Valenzuela Monjarraz

Literary Theorists: Julia Kristeva

Julia Kristeva


Julia Kristeva, was born in June 24, 1941 in Sliven, Bulgaria. She is a philosopher, theorist of literature and feminism, psychoanalyst and Bulgarian-born French writer. She was educated at a French school and then studied linguistics at the University of Sofia. In 1965, at the age of 24, she moved to Paris, studied at the University of Paris and the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, while publishing articles in journals such as Tel Quel, Critique and Langages. From 1970-1983, she joined the editorial staff of Tel Quel. Currently, she teachesSemiotics in New York State University and the University of Paris VII "Denis Diderot". Her work, of great complexity, usually falls in the critique of structuralism (neo-structuralism and post-structuralism), influenced by Claude Levi-Strauss, Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Sigmund Freud and, above all, Jacques Lacan. She is married to the French writer Philippe Sollers.

"Death lives a human life, said Hegel. This is true when we are not in love or analysis." Julia Kristeva make  the crossing of structuralism and semiotics. She was influenced by the May of 1968 and Maoism. With that spirit, she spoke at the French Institute in Madrid: “who is not in love nor psychoanalyze or write, is dead."
Julia Kristeva is now far from the major models and paradigms of the social sciences and literary theory that shook the university scene of the sixties and seventies. The abjection, love, melancholy, take their classes and their reflections. And for about seven or eight years everything revolves around his work as a psychoanalyst, consultation and their patients, including the topics she chooses for your university seminars. She was in Madrid to discuss the love-theme of her latest book, and mainly attracted an audience of psychoanalysts, not always satisfied with her original certainly unorthodox approaches. Explain that, indeed, who is not in love nor psychoanalyze or write, is dead.



Love stories Kristeva explains are woven myths and literary figures, in which the writer studied shows its semiotic and psychoanalytic wisdom: Narciso, Don Juan, Romeo and Juliet, the Virgin, the Troubadours, Stendhal, Baudelaire, Bataille, and Freud. In these books about love also becomes especially their theological knowledge density. Julia Kristeva says that she cares deeply the evocations of Karol Wojtyla, performing in her travels or in her speeches at the Vatican. A purpose of individualism, says without the slightest trace of irony: "After all, the need to accept yourself is a commandment of God in the Old Testament: Love yourself."

When asked if Julia Kristeva feels even radical, nods, but not grand gestures and a lot of passion, and the radical claims that her work is precisely the impact on people's lives through the "modest commitment psychoanalysis ", something like an absolutely microscopic and nothing momentous life change, to transform the world by reconciling people to themselves.

Jhony de Jesús Izquierdo

Two Object Poems



Jhony Izquierdo Heredia

Yuri Tinianov

Yuri Tinianov: The literary evolution


Literary history is largely dominated by an individualistic psychologist that has replaced the literary problems and reducing the literary richness with the psychology of the author. Also, this point of views psychologist was applied to problems like evolution or genesis literary.

      Literary history must meet the requirements of authenticity if want to become a science. All terms and foremost the term "literary history", should be examined. Literary history is taken from two points of view: the study of the genesis and the evolution of the literary series. According to what be analyzed will be how it is analyzed. The study of evolution must avoid the confusion of taking data from one system and used it for analysis in another system, avoid the subjective flavor.



The consideration of the work as a system can be linked with formal theories to understand the history of literature from the formal theory. The study of isolated elements (rhythm, syntax, work, theme, in prose and poetry) is helpful and thanks to this the structural hypothesis could isolate: the elements could be mingled and interact enter them in an constructive form.

          Constructive function is the ability of an element to enter in correlation with another belonging to system and outside the system. We must not fall into the comparison of elements in a system with another system without considering the constructive role.

What is a "literary event" for a time may be a only a linguistic element at another, according to the literary system in which it is situated. Isolated study of a work does not give us certainty about its construction. The autonomous function is the necessary condition for discover the literary functions and its constructive role in a particular culture.


Diego Elí Acosta Gárate

miércoles, 22 de mayo de 2013

Lautremont’s Image



Beautiful as the encounter of a tear rolling down a butterfly´s cheek and the song of poetry.
María Angélica Cantarell

Beautiful like the meeting of a mermaid and a unicorn in a sparkle lake.
Marco Hernández

Beautiful as the encounter of a full moon into the dark side of the sun
Francisco Valenzuela

Beautiful like the meeting of a tiger and a camel on the snow.
Isabel Álvarez

Beautiful as the encounter of a tear and the pain on a cloud of sadness
Eyri Polanco

Beautiful as the encounter of each light illuminate to reach a happy ending.
Erika Sibaja

Beautiful as the chance meeting between ancientness and childhood road to hell
Erik Verdejo


Beautiful like the meeting of Romeo and Juliet on Disneyland.
Isabel Álvarez


Beautiful as the meeting between the moon and the sun reflecting in your eyes
Jhony Izquierdo

Beautiful as the encounter of the sea and the sky.
Daniel Perez Martinez

Beautiful as the encounter of the fantasy and your dreams.
Bryan Yahir Castañeda

Beautiful as the furtive encounter between a ballet shoes and a dancer in the middle of Beethoven's fifth symphony.
Angélica Carrillo